Monthly Archives: March 2012

Corporate America’s Shadow Government

Posted on by

Ever wonder why, when Arizona passes an anti-immigrant bill, suddenly similar bills show up in other state legislatures? Or why, as North Carolina legislators introduce a Voter ID bill designed to suppress minority and student votes, similar bills are making their way through dozens of other states?

It’s not coincidence. And it’s not merely some sort of copycat, legislative follow-the-leader. It’s orchestrated by an organization called ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council).

Sponsored by large corporations, ALEC describes itself as “a membership organization of state legislators which favors federalism and conservative public policy solutions.” More accurately, ALECWatch.org describes the group as “a screen for hundreds of big corporations and trade associations to advance their legislative agendas in state capitols from coast to coast.”

Membership of ALEC’s Private Enterprise Board reads like a Who’s Who of big, greedy corporations and conservative special interest groups: CenterPoint360, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Reynolds American, Wal-Mart, Johnson&Johnson, PhRMA, KraftFoods, AT&T, UPS, ExxonMobil, Altria, State Farm, and, of course, the now infamous Koch Industries, to name but a few.

Here’s how it works: ALEC maintains a staff of “scholars”, lawyers and conservative ideologues who write legislation on behalf of its corporate sponsors. It then distributes the proposed bills for its legislative members to introduce in every state legislature in America. Often the legislators don’t even read the bills which carry their names until after they’ve introduced them. An example is a Florida legislator who, upon introducing a bill on the floor of the Florida statehouse, began reading the ALEC “for your eyes only” instructions that accompanied the bill.

In Arizona alone, ALEC members have introduced more than 50 ALEC–authored bills during the current legislative session. These bills read like a robber baron’s wish list, ranging from cutting corporate taxes to eliminating collective bargaining to privatizing more prisons to eliminating regulations and public oversight of corporations.

There are no comparable organizations for private citizens and progressives. Indeed, ALEC’s website brags that “ALEC is the only state legislative organization that adopts policies and creates model legislation for its members to use in their states. To date, ALEC has nearly 1,000 pieces of model legislation.”

And you probably thought your legislators were elected to work for you! To learn more, read the report on ALEC by Defenders of Wildlife and the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Right Wing Attack Pig.

Posted on by

That may seem cruel, but to call Rush-To-The-Pharmacy Limbaugh a right wing attack dog would be an insult to dogs. Even junk yard dogs. For years, Limbaugh has made millions from his vitriolic attacks on liberals. But this past week he unleashed his disgusting mouth on a new target:  Women.

Following Sandra Fluke’s testimony before an unofficial Congressional committee (Teapublicans refused to let her, or any other woman, testify before the official committee hearing) on the medical need for contraceptives, he chose to label the 30-year-old college student a “slut” and a “prostitute.” He asserted that the reason she needed her insurance company to pay for contraception is that she’s “having so much sex” she couldn’t afford to pay for contraception herself. He then offered to buy aspirin for every female college student in Georgetown to place between their knees as a form of birth control.

A few days later, he continued to attack Fluke by saying “If we’re going to pay for your contraceptives and thus pay for you to have sex, we want something for it. We want you to post the videos online so we can all watch.”

So, in addition to being a well-known drug addict, he must also be a pervert. Could it be that he’s trying to cover up his own sexual inadequacies? Or is he simply angry that few women would want this Jabba The Hut impersonator to climb on top of them?

Update: The furor over Limbaugh’s comments have resulted in the loss of numerous sponsors for his radio show. And the reaction has become so intense, for the first time in memory, he posted an apology for his “choice of words” on his website. But it seems to be much too little too late.  Advertisers continue to disassociate themselves from Rush.  And women have turned on the GOP.

Guns Don’t Kill People. Gun Laws Do!

Posted on by

There are more than 200 million guns in ciruclation in the US. More than 40 percent of households claim to have one or more guns in the home. And those numbers have grown dramatically ever since a man of African-American heritage was inaugurated as president.

According to statistics compiled by the CDC National Center for Injury Prevention and Control and calculated by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, in a single year almost 100,000 Americans are shot or killed with a gun. Of those, 31,593 people die from gun violence, including the 12,179 who are murdered. Another 66,769 Americans survive gun injuries, including 44,466 who are shot in an attack. In one year, 18,223 Americans kill themselves with guns, and 3,031 more survive a suicide attempt with a gun.

Among 23 populous, high-income countries, 80% of all firearm deaths occur in the United States.

Obviously, we need more gun control. Not less. But hunters and gun collectors need not worry about common sense regulations for hunting rifles and shotguns. Gun violence statistics overwhelmingly apply to handguns.

For example, in 2005, 75% of the 10,100 firearm-involved homicides in the United States were committed using handguns. That compares to just 4% with rifles and 5% with shotguns. The remaining 16% were committed using an unspecified type of firearm. So it’s clear that merely limiting the sale and carry of handguns could greatly diminish gun violence in the US.

As for Teapublican and National Rifle Association (please note the word “rifle” in the name) claims that guns are needed to prevent crimes, statistics clearly expose those claims as fraudulent. According to the FBI, each year private citizens are responsible for approximately 200 legally justified self-defense homicides. An even more inconvenient statistic for handgun proponents is from a 2009 study which found that people in possession of a gun are 4.5 times more likely to be shot in an assault!

Guns are used to intimidate and threaten 4 to 6 times more often than they are used to thwart crime. They are 4 times more likely to be used in an unintentional shooting than for self-defense and 22 times more likely to be used in a suicide.

Further, it’s estimated that gun violence in the US costs $100 billion annually.  So limiting the sale and possession of handguns could even help lower our national debt!

Independents Selling Themselves, And The Nation, Short.

Posted on by

For most of my adult life, I was an independent voter. Even though I never failed to vote, I disdained much of the political process. I told myself that both the Democratic and Republican parties were flawed; that their goals didn’t reflect those of the majority of Americans. The few times I had become involved in creating advertising for candidates, I was horrified by the win-at-any-cost mentality of their campaign staffs.

In theory, I relished the ability to vote in either primary and to vote for candidates of either party. In practice, I was a reliable voter for Democrats, although I often wished they had chosen candidates who better reflected my political views; those of a social liberal and a fiscal conservative. Moreover, I told myself that, by being an independent, I could remain above the ugliness that is American politics.

When I moved to Arizona that changed.

You see, several years earlier, I came to the realization that it was unlikely that I would ever vote for a Republican again – any Republican. So when I was asked to fill out my voter registration form, I marked the box indicating I wished to become a registered Democrat. But it was only when I was asked to actively participate in a local unit of the Democratic Party that I realized that my previous Independent status was more a matter of laziness than of principle.

By registering as an Independent, I didn’t have to actively participate in the political process. Certainly, I voted, but I didn’t have to help create a party platform. I didn’t have to go to party meetings. I didn’t have to help register new voters. I didn’t have to help select candidates. I didn’t have to help candidates raise money for their campaigns. I didn’t have to place yard signs and pass out literature for candidates. I didn’t have to canvas door-to-door. I didn’t have to vote in primaries. I didn’t have to call potential voters.  And I didn’t have to help turn out the vote.

I tell my story only because I think our nation deserves better than those who refuse to actively participate in the political process. It deserves better than a bunch of people sitting on the sidelines all the while complaining about the parties and their candidates. If you truly care about your country and its future, you should register with a political party and get involved. Voting alone is not enough.