Monthly Archives: September 2011

Teapublican Lie #8.

Posted on by

“Most Americans don’t pay taxes.”

Lately, Teapublicans have been saying that 51% of Americans don’t pay any taxes at all. They say that those Americans should be forced to “have some skin in the game.” They call them the “Freeloader Class.” And they blame them for the nation’s economic woes.

While it is true that 51 percent of Americans did not pay federal income taxes for tax year 2009, it is not true that they did not pay taxes. It’s not even true (as Teapublicans suggest) that they are lazy, welfare recipients content to sponge off society. In fact, many of those who paid no federal income taxes in 2009 were among the wealthy and the upper middle class!

From an article by PolitiFact.com, Bob Williams, a tax policy specialist at the nonpartisan Urban Institute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center, said there are lots of popular tax breaks, which are sometimes called tax expenditures. “We estimate they total more than a trillion dollars a year in reduced taxes and, in fact, the bulk of those go to the top end of the income distribution,” said Williams.

As for the rest, they are mostly the elderly living on Social Security and those working at minimum wage jobs that don’t make enough to pay federal income taxes. (According to the 2010 Census, one in six Americans now lives below the poverty line.) Yet these people still pay taxes. Many pay payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare. All pay sales taxes. Many pay state income taxes and property taxes (even if they rent). And most pay gasoline taxes, beer and liquor taxes, etc. So they do, indeed, “have some skin in the game.”

The real freeloaders are those who are living off the hard work of others – those who have inherited fortunes from their ancestors, Wall Street bankers who are paid enormous bonuses to gamble with others’ money, and those who, by a stroke of luck, have found themselves in a position of power – and taking advantage of a host of tax shelters created by politicians to protect their benefactors.

Teapublican Lie #7.

Posted on by

“Raising taxes on millionaires will hurt small business.”

After all, most small businesses are owned by millionaires, right? Rrrrright!

This whopper seems to stem from the Teapublican definition of small business. You see, they define small business by ownership rather than brands, offices, employees or income. In other words, since Cargill is a closely held, privately-owned company, Teapublicans define it as a “small” business. Similarly, they define Koch Industries as a “small” business. In case you don’t already know, these are the two largest privately-held corporations in the world! Both measure their profits by the billions. Yet Teapublicans lump them into the same category as the owners of the small clothing store on Main Street or the corner café!

In the interest of full disclosure, I’ve been a small business owner since 1987. Moreover, I’ve served hundreds of small businesses as clients. As it happens, I have also completed projects for Cargill and Koch Industries. I can tell you beyond the shadow of a doubt that those companies have absolutely nothing in common with small businesses. And I can tell you that 99 percent of the other clients are not owned by millionaires, let alone billionaires.

So, President Obama and Congress, go ahead, raise taxes on millionaires and billionaires. Most small business owners will thank you for it.

The Kings and Queen of Mean.

Posted on by

So far, the debates between Teapublican presidential candidates have been very entertaining. Watching them is somewhat like watching Voldemort, Simon Legree, the Joker, Scrooge, Alfred E. Neuman, Lex Luthor and the Wicked Witch of the West face off to see who can be nastier, more spiteful, more repugnant and more snide.

Yet the sentiments of the audiences have been even more revealing.

In one debate, an audience of upper middle class white Californians actually broke out in applause upon the mere mention of Gov. Perry’s 234 executions. In another debate, when confronted with the question of whether or not the government should allow a hypothetical uninsured young American die, members of the pitchfork crowd in Tampa screamed “yes.”

And these are the religious so-called “values” people?

If voters are unwise enough to put them in charge of our country, we won’t have to build a bigger fence to keep immigrants out of our country. We’ll have to build one to keep our own citizens in.

Teapublican Lie #6.

Posted on by

“President Obama’s economic stimulus failed.”

You’ve heard this over and over again from the mouths of virtually every Teapublican. They all loudly proclaim President Obama’s stimulus plan “a complete and utter failure.” They make it sound as if Democrats wasted $787 billion of taxpayer money. But as you’ll see, it’s just another Teapublican lie. To learn the truth, I turned to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

In the second quarter of 2010 (one year after it’s passage), CBO estimated that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) had:

– Raised the level of real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product (GDP) by between 1.7 percent and 4.5 percent
– Lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.7 percentage points and 1.8 percentage points
– Increased the number of people employed by between 1.4 million and 3.3 million
– Increased the number of full-time-equivalent (FTE) jobs by 2.0 million to 4.8 million

Similarly, in the second quarter of 2011, the CBO estimated that ARRA’s policies had the following effects compared with what would have occurred otherwise:

– Raised real (inflation-adjusted) gross domestic product by between 0.8 percent and 2.5 percent
– Lowered the unemployment rate by between 0.5 percentage points and 1.6 percentage points
– Increased the number of people employed by between 1.0 million and 2.9 million
– Increased the number of full-time-equivalent (FTE) jobs by 1.4 million to 4.0 million

And even though CBO has said that the employment effects will wane in 2012, it estimates “ARRA will raise real GDP in 2012 by between 0.3 percent and 0.8 percent and will increase the number of people employed in 2012 by between 0.4 million and 1.1 million.”

Some failure!

The real question about the economic stimulus is, “Where would we now be without it?”

Teapublican Lie #5.

Posted on by

“Regulations are bad for business.”

Teapublicans have been slinging this bovine excrement around for years. “Businesses face mountains of government red tape that make it impossible for them to operate,” they say. I admit it sounds plausible, but it’s just not true.

Certainly, every industry faces government regulations. But those regulations are not necessarily bad. For example, food growers must meet food safety regulations. They must maintain sanitary conditions and monitor the use of pesticides and chemicals. Not exactly onerous regulations, unless you don’t mind getting food borne illnesses. Similarly, restaurants must pass inspections for cleanliness and food preparation. Hotels must meet standards for safety and cleanliness…the list of such examples is long.

Contrary to the Teapublican talking point, a recent study by McClatchy Newspapers found that small business owners don’t feel that regulations and taxes are strangling their businesses at all. As a matter of fact, many of the business owners surveyed felt that the regulations actually create consumer confidence which is good for business.

So, if small business owners don’t oppose government regulations, who does?

One can conclude that the businesses most harmed by government regulation are those that don’t care about consumer safety. Companies that want to trash our environment without repercussions. Companies that want to cut corners to save money. Companies like BP, which apparently cut corners on a blowout preventer resulting in the worst environmental tragedy in history. Companies that buy toys painted with lead because they’re cheaper. Companies that purchase ingredients for pet food without testing them.

These aren’t small businesses. They’re huge, multi-national conglomerates that are more concerned about their bottom lines than their customers. If they don’t care about us, why on Earth should we care about them?

Teapublican Lie #4.

Posted on by

“The national debt was created by President Obama.”

I’ve addressed this figment of the Teapublican imagination before. They know it’s a lie, but they’re fond of saying it anyway. Indeed, they’re fond of blaming President Obama for everything bad and taking credit for everything good.

Who created the Great Recession? According to Teapublicans, it wasn’t Bush. It was Obama.

Who’s responsible for the high unemployment rate? Why Obama, of course, even though 8 million jobs were lost on Bush’s watch while the Obama administration has overseen a net increase in jobs.

Who was responsible for tracking down Osama bin Laden? According to Teapublicans it was certainly not Obama. Bin Laden’s death was the direct result of Bush/Cheney policies. You’ve heard all these lies and more.

Now, back to the national debt:

No less an authority than Bruce Bartlett, Ronald Reagan’s former policy adviser, has said that of the more than $14 trillion national debt, more than $7 trillion is a direct result of George W. Bush’s policies – most especially his tax cuts and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Only $1.4 trillion is the result of President Obama’s attempts to get our economy moving in the right direction! The remainder can be credited to all of the presidents prior to Bush.

I’ll finish by quoting David Stockman, Reagan’s Director of the Office of Management and Budget who began a NY Times op-ed by stating, “How my GOP destroyed the US economy.”

Apparently, at least some Republicans are willing to speak the truth.

Teapublican Lie #3.

Posted on by

“Cutting deficits and the national debt will create jobs.”

This is the most fashionable load of bull excrement being sold by Teapublicans. But nothing could be further from the truth.

Certainly, the debt has a chilling effect on the long-term prospects of our economy. But the debt does not constitute a crisis. In fact, the total debt equals roughly one year of the US GDP. To relate that to a family’s finances (as Teapublicans are so fond of doing), it’s akin to a family earning $100,000 per year holding a $100,000 mortgage.

Now let’s look at what severe cuts to our deficit and debt will do to our economy in the short term.

When the government cuts spending it cuts the budgets of government agencies. That forces those agencies to lay off many of their employees. So, inevitably, there’s a net loss of jobs. Further, the decrease in employees results in less oversight of banks, food and drugs, Medicare payments, etc. – all of which make our economy and taxpayers less safe. 

Moreover, government cuts can have a negative effect on private companies that act as vendors to those agencies. For example, large cuts to the Department of Defense will cause the DOD to suspend weapons acquisition and development. That means defense contractors will have to make dramatic cuts to their payroll.

Part of the reason for our jobless recovery from Bush’s Great Recession is that state and local governments are experiencing a loss of revenue from taxpayers. As a result, those governments have been laying off workers even faster than private companies can hire them.

So, in the short term, what do you expect a $1 trillion cut to our deficit will do to our economy? Obviously, it will cost tens of thousands of people their jobs. Maybe yours!

Teapublican Lie #2.

Posted on by

“US corporate taxes are the highest in the world.”

You’ve heard it over and over during the past 2-1/2 years. Not only from Teapublicans. But from supposedly authoritative sources such as the US Chamber of Commerce. So let’s examine this myth more closely.

While it is true that the corporate income tax rate for the US is 34.2% (which includes a state tax rate of 6%), that is not significantly higher than the corporate tax rate for many other developed nations, and it’s less than Japan’s. Brazil has a rate of 32.5%; France and Germany have tax rates of more than 31%; Australia 30.8%; Canada 28% and the UK has a rate of 25.4%.

More to the point, this is not the rate that most large US corporations actually pay. In fact, the effective tax rate for large US corporations (after deductions and subsidies) is less than 18%!

For example, 12 major corporations made $171 billion in profits from 2008 to 2010, yet had a negative income tax rate of 1.5 percent! And the most egregious example is GE. Last year the global conglomerate generated $10.3 billion in pretax income, but ended up owing nothing in US federal income taxes. In fact, it recorded a tax benefit of $1.1 billion!

Moreover, employer payroll taxes in the US are just 7.7% – less than Korea, India, Mexico, Poland and most of the developed world. And since the 1940s, the corporate share of all federal income taxes has dropped dramatically. In 1940, corporations paid 43 percent of all the federal income taxes collected in the US. But, in 2010, that percentage was only 8.9 percent! Indeed, the US raises less corporate tax revenue than most developed countries.

So though the US has the world’s 2nd highest corporate income tax rate, the rate actually paid by US corporations is much lower. In fact, our effective tax rate is less than that of even Mexico, India, Vietnam, Korea, China and Russia. And that’s the truth!

Teapublican Lie #1.

Posted on by

Today begins a series intended to de-bunk the many Teapublican lies that will be repeated over the coming election season. Primary amongst them is this pants-on-fire whopper:  “Cutting taxes creates jobs.”

This whopper has been repeated so often by so many that voters have come to believe it’s true. Yet when you examine the evidence, you find that it defies belief.  For example, if cutting taxes created jobs, then why was there negative job creation during the Bush administration despite the vaunted Bush tax cuts? (And that was even before the economy was driven off a cliff during the last few months of 2008.)

If cutting taxes created jobs, why did the economy flourish under the Clinton administration despite higher taxes?

And if cutting taxes creates jobs, why is our unemployment now so high despite the fact that US citizens are paying the lowest share of their income for taxes – all taxes – since 1958?

Truth is, the only thing cutting taxes on corporations and the rich does for our economy is to increase wealth for those who need it least.

Are We Still Fighting The Civil War?

Posted on by

As I was reading a book about the Civil War, I was struck by the many similarities between the run-up to the war and today’s political climate. The Confederate States of America were sparsely populated and dominated by slave-owning plantation owners who resented any interference by the federal government. As one historian said, they likely would have seceded earlier, but it took 6 years for the plantation owners to convince the poor dirt farmers to fight their war for them.

On the other side, the Union was more densely populated with a recent influx of European immigrants. Many of these people had faced persecution themselves in the Old Country, and their religious beliefs were at odds with slavery. Moreover, as a result of the density of population, those in the North tended to understand that regulations and laws were necessary for everyone to thrive. Not just a few.

So the Civil War was as much the result of a conflict of philosophies as it was slavery. This conflict continued when, following the war, many former Confederate soldiers fled westward to get away from the law and order imposed by the victorious North. Unfortunately for them, they eventually ran out of real estate as settlers who believed in the law followed them west. But the philosophies of the former Confederates never entirely disappeared.

Fast forward to today. Our politics are now roughly divided into red states and blue states. The red states strongly oppose any “interference” by the federal government. And where are most of those red states? In the South and West.

And where are the blue states? In the heavily populated East, Upper Midwest, California and Northwest.

Certainly, there are pockets within the South and West where voters understand the necessary role of government. Those tend to be large population centers. But in the rural areas and smaller cities, government – especially the federal government – is viewed with disdain and suspicion.

Particularly in the West, many people identify with the cowboy mentality of old (not realizing that the term “cowboy” was originally a perjorative akin to calling someone a rustler or bandit). These people see themselves as modern day gunslingers who are standing up for their individual rights. They mostly could care less about anyone else, including the less fortunate. After all, to these people, everyone has the responsibility to pull themselves up by the bootstraps no matter the odds against it.

In the South, the story is somewhat different. Certainly resentment of the federal government continues. But now it’s wrapped in the cloak of religion. The new Christian right stems from churches that believe the Bible is literally the word of God. They selectively choose Bible verses that support their narrow views. They are anti-government (it’s the government that prevents openly Christian prayers in public schools and other public venues), anti-gay, anti-minority, anti-abortion, anti-education, anti-environmentalism, anti-evolution, anti-climate change, etc. If the government is for it, particularly the federal government, they are against it.

So here we are, politically not much further ahead than we were 150 years ago. But at least for the moment, we’re fighting with ballots. Not guns.