You are currently browsing the LaMaster’s Corner weblog archives for the day 28. June 2010.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | ||||
- Arizona (42)
- Cheney (19)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Constitution (29)
- Corporations (77)
- Culture (113)
- Current Events (164)
- Deficit (55)
- Economy (121)
- Education (21)
- Energy (19)
- Environment (33)
- Foreign Policy (1)
- Fracking (1)
- George W. Bush (15)
- Government (166)
- Guns (29)
- Health care (57)
- Homelessness (5)
- Immigration (23)
- Labor (31)
- Media (61)
- Medicare (32)
- Military (23)
- Politics (241)
- President Obama (87)
- Privatization (9)
- Religion (38)
- Social Security (29)
- Sports (3)
- Supreme Court (9)
- Taxes (63)
- Tea Party (98)
- Teapublicans (139)
- Terrorism (24)
- Tibet (2)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Voter Suppression (6)
- War (34)
- 21. May 2012: Three Explanations for Romney’s Claim He Doesn’t Remember Cruelty.
- 20. May 2012: How Teapublicans Win.
- 18. May 2012: Requiem For The American Dream.
- 14. May 2012: A Message To Moderate Republicans:
- 12. May 2012: What Politicians Aren't Telling You About The Economy.
- 11. May 2012: Shaking A Fist At God?
- 10. May 2012: The Politics of “Oh Yeh?"
- 5. May 2012: As Long As We're Telling The Truth...
- 2. May 2012: What’s Your Definition Of Freedom?
- 28. April 2012: Still Gutless After All These Years!
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
Archive for 28. June 2010
The Real Elitists.
28. June 2010 by admin.
One of the many things Republican teabaggers like to call liberals and progressives is “elitist.” In fact, the term is so common, if you watch Fox News Channel (I’m not sure why you’d want to) it seems the two terms are permanently wed – Liberal Elitist.
Now, I may be slow, but I can’t for the life of me think why the two terms should ever be used in the same sentence, let alone as a description of progressives. It would seem that the nitwits on Fox and Republican teabaggers have never consulted a dictionary. To wit:
Elitism is defined as: 1 - Belief in the concept of superiority. The belief that some people or things are inherently superior to others and deserve preeminence, preferential treatment, or higher rewards because of their superiority.
2 - Belief in control by a small group. The belief that government or control should be in the hands of a small group of privileged, wealthy, or intelligent people, or the active promotion of such a system.
Now let’s examine the policies of the two parties. Democrats believe in fighting for the middle and lower economic classes. They support small business, organized labor, civil rights and fair wages for working people. That doesn’t quite meet the definition of elitism, does it?
Republicans, on the other hand, believe in fighting for the wealthy and large corporations. For more than 40 years, they’ve been trying to break labor unions. They have also succeeded in transferring much of the nation’s wealth upward to the uber rich. In other words, Republicans believe in the inherent superiority of the privileged and the wealthy.
So how do Republicans get away with perpetuating this falsehood? They restate their goals in populist terms to make people think they will benefit, too. They bundle their ideas in ways that create fear and anger. And they simply repeat their lies until enough people think they’re true.
Posted in Corporations, Politics | Print | No Comments »