You are currently browsing the LaMaster’s Corner weblog archives for the day 28. April 2010.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | May » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
- Arizona (42)
- Cheney (19)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Constitution (29)
- Corporations (77)
- Culture (113)
- Current Events (164)
- Deficit (55)
- Economy (121)
- Education (21)
- Energy (19)
- Environment (33)
- Foreign Policy (1)
- Fracking (1)
- George W. Bush (15)
- Government (166)
- Guns (29)
- Health care (57)
- Homelessness (5)
- Immigration (23)
- Labor (31)
- Media (61)
- Medicare (32)
- Military (23)
- Politics (241)
- President Obama (87)
- Privatization (9)
- Religion (38)
- Social Security (29)
- Sports (3)
- Supreme Court (9)
- Taxes (63)
- Tea Party (98)
- Teapublicans (139)
- Terrorism (24)
- Tibet (2)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Voter Suppression (6)
- War (34)
- 21. May 2012: Three Explanations for Romney’s Claim He Doesn’t Remember Cruelty.
- 20. May 2012: How Teapublicans Win.
- 18. May 2012: Requiem For The American Dream.
- 14. May 2012: A Message To Moderate Republicans:
- 12. May 2012: What Politicians Aren't Telling You About The Economy.
- 11. May 2012: Shaking A Fist At God?
- 10. May 2012: The Politics of “Oh Yeh?"
- 5. May 2012: As Long As We're Telling The Truth...
- 2. May 2012: What’s Your Definition Of Freedom?
- 28. April 2012: Still Gutless After All These Years!
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
Archive for 28. April 2010
Main Street 57, Wall Street 41.
28. April 2010 by admin.
For two days in a row, a bill for financial reform came up 3 votes short in the Senate. All 41 Republican Senators voted to prevent debate. In other words, they voted to filibuster. Polls show the American public overwhelmingly wants to see financial reform because they understand that it was the high-risk gambling on Wall Street that caused the worst economy since the Great Depression. Yet Republicans voted in unison to block it.
Why?
The answer is simple. Republicans say that they want financial reform, but they don’t want it to interfere with the almighty “free” market. It took them 62 years to undo the Glass-Steagall Act and they don’t want to see a similar bill. They don’t want to limit their wealthy and powerful masters’ ability to make outrageous profits from consumers. They don’t want to allow any form of consumer protection. And they certainly don’t want the voting public to see them taking the side of Wall Street in an open debate.
By keeping the debate behind closed doors, Republicans can make deals with bank lobbyists that will keep the money flowing on Wall Street and, more importantly, keep the money flowing toward Republican candidates.
So, for now, we’re treated to a high stakes game of cat and mouse. Democrats will keep asking for debate on financial reform, and Republicans will keep voting to block it. How long before Main Street reminds Republicans who they’re supposed to be working for?
Posted in Tea Party, Teapublicans, Current Events, Politics, Government, Economy | Print | No Comments »