You are currently browsing the LaMaster’s Corner weblog archives for the day 21. April 2010.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Mar | May » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | ||
- Arizona (42)
- Cheney (19)
- Civil Rights (1)
- Constitution (29)
- Corporations (77)
- Culture (113)
- Current Events (163)
- Deficit (55)
- Economy (121)
- Education (21)
- Energy (19)
- Environment (33)
- Foreign Policy (1)
- Fracking (1)
- George W. Bush (15)
- Government (166)
- Guns (29)
- Health care (57)
- Homelessness (5)
- Immigration (23)
- Labor (31)
- Media (61)
- Medicare (32)
- Military (23)
- Politics (240)
- President Obama (87)
- Privatization (9)
- Religion (38)
- Social Security (29)
- Sports (3)
- Supreme Court (9)
- Taxes (63)
- Tea Party (98)
- Teapublicans (138)
- Terrorism (24)
- Tibet (2)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Voter Suppression (6)
- War (34)
- 20. May 2012: How Teapublicans Win.
- 18. May 2012: Requiem For The American Dream.
- 14. May 2012: A Message To Moderate Republicans:
- 12. May 2012: What Politicians Aren't Telling You About The Economy.
- 11. May 2012: Shaking A Fist At God?
- 10. May 2012: The Politics of “Oh Yeh?"
- 5. May 2012: As Long As We're Telling The Truth...
- 2. May 2012: What’s Your Definition Of Freedom?
- 28. April 2012: Still Gutless After All These Years!
- 27. April 2012: How “Starve The Beast” Became “Starve The Poor.”
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
Archive for 21. April 2010
Is Fox News Channel Owned By Terrorists?
21. April 2010 by admin.
Let us know what you think. Does Sean Hannity side with Nazis? Take our poll. Is Bill O’Reilly a fascist? You decide. Did Glenn Beck have a sex change operation? What do readers think? Many say that Sarah Palin is a biggoted sociopath? What is the real truth? Did Michelle Bachmann meet her husband while a patient at his mental health clinic? Vote now.
If you haven’t spent much time watching Fox News Channel, you might think that all of this is a joke. But it’s what passes for journalism on Fox. The only difference is that all of the innuendo and snide questions are about Democrats and liberals. Even when the few journalists on Fox are trying to present their version of news, the type crawling across the bottom of the screen continues to raise absurd questions about the political opposition. In fact, the bias of the “fair and balanced” network became so obvious, that Fox News finally admitted that the majority (two-thirds) of its programming is “political commentary.”
Right-wing theater would be a more accurate description.
More recently, the owner of Fox, Rupert Murdoch, was asked to name one Democrat on his “fair and balanced” noise network. He was unable to. But he was sure “they had one.”
If ever there was a rational argument for a return of the Fairness Doctrine, this is it. If you aren’t familiar with it, the Fairness Doctrine was introduced in 1949 as a policy of the Federal Communications Commission” (FCC). It required broadcasters to present issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that was honest, fair and balanced. Unfortunately, the Fairness Doctrine was abolished in 1987, likely the result of Republicans unhappy with the media’s treatment of their policies to redistribute wealth upward.
Since the end of the Fairness Doctrine, we’ve seen a constant rise in right-wing radio and television with no limits on the lies that can be told. No prohibitions against inciting hatred. And no restrictions against using the public airwaves to promote political ideology and candidates. This puts the power in the hands of a few, very wealthy (and largely conservative) media owners, especially since the ratings for liberal media tend to be lower than for conservatives. After all, for many, it’s more entertaining to listen to some angry, white blowhards rail against government, social programs, minorities, immigrants and taxes than it is to listen to someone promoting equality and social responsibility.
It’s time for Congress to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine. Without it, the only alternative is to spend hours each week researching political issues to determine the truth – assuming, of course, that you actually care about the future of the nation.
Posted in Current Events, Media, Culture, Government, Terrorism | Print | No Comments »