Categories
- Arizona (37)
- Cheney (18)
- Constitution (20)
- Corporations (66)
- Culture (98)
- Current Events (137)
- Deficit (51)
- Economy (109)
- Education (16)
- Energy (15)
- Environment (27)
- Fracking (1)
- George W. Bush (9)
- Government (138)
- Guns (18)
- Health care (42)
- Homelessness (5)
- Immigration (20)
- Labor (27)
- Media (54)
- Medicare (23)
- Military (21)
- Politics (203)
- President Obama (72)
- Privatization (6)
- Religion (26)
- Social Security (22)
- Sports (2)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Taxes (53)
- Tea Party (95)
- Teapublicans (111)
- Terrorism (24)
- Tibet (2)
- Uncategorized (1)
- Voter Suppression (4)
- War (28)
Latest Postings
- 26. January 2012: The Civil War 2.0.
- 25. January 2012: Patriots? Or Idiots?
- 22. January 2012: Newt = John Edwards To The Nth Degree.
- 20. January 2012: Masters Of The Double Standard.
- 19. January 2012: Raising Cain.
- 9. January 2012: The Wisdom Of Iowa.
- 5. January 2012: Lies, Damn Lies and Teapublican Lies.
- 29. December 2011: The Great Right Hopes?
- 27. December 2011: The Know-Nothing Network.
- 23. December 2011: Presidential Backstabbing.
Archives
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
22. August 2009 at 21:05
It’s true that there’s tons of disinformation out there, but BO’s done no favors for progressives either. He really ticked me off when he started to cave on the public option. Maybe I’m not getting the nuances, but it seems to me that if there’s no public option, there’s no reform—at least not any kind of reform that could trickle down to a self-employed person who’s inurance consist of corporate robbery by company A, or corporate robbery by company B. Now, as you know, I was initially a Hillary supporter, and much of the reason I favored her to Obama was that her health plan seemed clear and inclusive, and Obama’s seemed muddled and “optional.” His inability to gain support for healthcare hasn’t simply been a lack of finding the right soundbite. It’s starting to seem that, at core, they guy really isn’t all that committed to universal coverage, or anything that even approaches real cost control. There’s a big difference between compromising and collapsing. I hope his week at Martha’s Vinyard will make him come back a new man (meaning one who’s grown a pair.) Did you read Paul Krugman’s column in the NYTimes yesterday? I thought he was dead on. Seems to me that the whole “granny killing” notion could have been nipped in the bud by pointing out all the medicare grannies (such as my 90 year old mother) who have been extremely well cared for with far better health
care than those of us under the private system.